AI Visibility Score

GetResponse

7.7 / 100

Ranked #228 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28

Questions named in
5
Total mentions
5
Average position
5.8
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees GetResponse.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 7.7 #234 4 5.3

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“…(CRO). 2. Best All-in-One Marketing & Landing Pages: GetResponse or ActiveCampaign If you need a landing page builder that comes tightly integrated with email marketing and automation, going with a...”
gemini position 3 · “recommend a good landing page builder tool”
“…squeeze pages, portfolios, and "coming soon" pages. * GetResponse (Plans start around $15–$19/month): While technically an email marketing platform, GetResponse includes a very capable landing page b...”
gemini position 4 · “cheapest landing page builder software”
“…ti-step buying journey. 4. Best Free-to-Paid Scaler: GetResponse While GetResponse started as an email marketing platform, it has evolved into a robust marketing platform with an exceptionally stron...”
gemini position 7 · “top landing page builder platforms”
“…est Free-to-Start Option: Mailchimp (formerly Landingi or GetResponse) If you are just starting out and need a simple page to collect emails with zero upfront investment, email marketing tools with b...”
gemini position 7 · “best landing page builder software”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as GetResponse.

#BrandScoreShared questions
15 Mailchimp 44.7 4
187 SeedProd 9.8 3
108 Elementor 15.4 3
84 Unbounce 19.9 3
36 MailerLite 30.7 2
133 Carrd 13.3 2
100 Leadpages 16.6 2
217 ClickFunnels 8.2 2

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

GetResponse AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →