AI Visibility Score
Harvest
24.9
/ 100
Ranked #67 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28
- Questions named in
- 13
- Total mentions
- 16
- Average position
- 3.4
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Harvest.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 27.4 | #64 | 12 | 3.3 |
| Groq Llama 3.3 70B | 10.4 | #109 | 2 | 4.5 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“Harvest and Clockify are both popular time-tracking tools used by individuals and teams to manage their work hours, projects, and clients. Here's a comparison of the two: Similarities: * Both Harvest...”
groq
position 1 · “Harvest vs Clockify”
“Choosing between Harvest and Clockify really comes down to what you need out of a time tracker: Harvest is built for end-to-end agency management (time, invoicing, and expenses), while Clockify is fam...”
gemini
position 2 · “Harvest vs Clockify”
“…s free tier; paid plans start around $9/user/month. 2. Harvest – Best for Invoicing and Agencies If your time tracking needs are directly tied to billing clients, Harvest is hard to beat. * Why it’s...”
gemini
position 2 · “best time tracking software”
“…k timer that makes starting and stopping effortless. * Harvest: Excellent if you want time tracking tied directly to invoicing and expense tracking. Once you log your hours, turning them into a profe...”
gemini
position 2 · “time tracking software comparison”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Harvest.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | Clockify | 29.1 | 15 |
| 38 | Toggl Track | 30.5 | 11 |
| 177 | RescueTime | 10.2 | 6 |
| 3 | QuickBooks | 61.5 | 4 |
| 23 | Xero | 35.5 | 4 |
| 257 | Hubstaff | 6.4 | 4 |
| 13 | FreshBooks | 45.1 | 3 |
| 151 | Teachable | 11.6 | 3 |
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.