AI Visibility Score
HubSpot Meetings
8.2
/ 100
Ranked #218 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28
- Questions named in
- 4
- Total mentions
- 4
- Average position
- 3.0
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees HubSpot Meetings.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 10.0 | #196 | 4 | 3.0 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“…ve zero budget, these tools offer robust free tiers: * HubSpot Meetings: If you need a professional booking page that syncs with Google Calendar or Office 365, HubSpot’s free tier is fantastic. It al...”
gemini
position 1 · “cheapest appointment scheduling software”
“…ons before they lock in a time. 3. Best Free Option: HubSpot Meetings * Best for: Freelancers, marketers, and sales reps on a budget. * Why it’s great: If you already use HubSpot (or even if you don...”
gemini
position 3 · “best appointment scheduling software”
“…al checkout and online booking. 4. Best Free Option: HubSpot Meetings If you are already using HubSpot for CRM or marketing (or just want a robust free tool), their meeting scheduler is fantastic. *...”
gemini
position 4 · “top appointment scheduling platforms”
“…schedules and accept walk-in payments on the go. 4. HubSpot Meetings (Best for CRM & Sales Teams) * Best for: B2B companies, agencies, and businesses already using HubSpot for marketing or sales. *...”
gemini
position 4 · “recommend a good appointment scheduling tool”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as HubSpot Meetings.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45 | Calendly | 29.8 | 4 |
| 101 | Acuity Scheduling | 16.6 | 4 |
| 107 | Square Appointments | 15.5 | 4 |
| 25 | Square Online | 34.7 | 3 |
| 1 | HubSpot | 100.0 | 2 |
| 149 | Cal.com | 11.7 | 1 |
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.