AI Visibility Score

Pipedrive

31.8 / 100

Ranked #30 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28

Questions named in
17
Total mentions
35
Average position
3.9
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Pipedrive.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 36.8 #30 16 4.1
Groq Llama 3.3 70B 43.4 #22 10 3.5

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“Ah, the classic Zoho vs. Pipedrive debate! This is a really common comparison, as both are excellent CRM options, but they cater to slightly different philosophies and business needs. Let's break it d...”
gemini position 1 · “Zoho vs Pipedrive”
“…specialized tool and a versatile platform! Choosing between Pipedrive and Monday.com really comes down to your primary needs and how your team operates. Here's a breakdown to help you decide: --- Pi...”
gemini position 1 · “Pipedrive vs Monday.com”
“Choosing between Zoho CRM and Pipedrive usually comes down to one main battle: complex customization and value vs. pure sales speed and ease of use. Both are top-tier CRM (Customer Relationship Manage...”
gemini position 1 · “Zoho vs Pipedrive”
“Choosing between Pipedrive and Monday.com usually comes down to one main question: Are you looking for a dedicated sales CRM, or do you need a flexible workspace to manage projects, teams, and operati...”
gemini position 1 · “Pipedrive vs Monday.com”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as Pipedrive.

#BrandScoreShared questions
1 HubSpot 100.0 34
34 Zoho CRM 31.2 25
81 Salesforce 20.2 23
86 Freshsales 19.3 17
7 monday.com 55.2 12
16 ActiveCampaign 43.0 8
164 Microsoft Dynamics 365 10.6 6
199 Close 9.1 6

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

Pipedrive AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →