AI Visibility Score

SignWell

18.5 / 100

Ranked #90 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28

Questions named in
10
Total mentions
11
Average position
4.0
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees SignWell.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 21.2 #88 10 4.3

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“…what they do best: 1. The Best Overall Free Option: SignWell If you regularly need to send documents to *other* people to sign, SignWell is arguably the best free tier on the market. * The Free Plan...”
gemini position 1 · “best free e-signature tool”
“…ere are some affordable e-signature software options: 1. SignWell: Offers a free plan with unlimited documents and signatures, making it a great option for individuals or small businesses. Paid plans...”
groq position 1 · “cheapest e-signature software”
“…obust document-building features might be overkill. 5. SignWell (Best Budget-Friendly / Free Option) If you are on a tight budget or just need to sign documents occasionally, SignWell offers a fanta...”
gemini position 4 · “best e-signature software”
“…times a month. 2. Best for Budget-Conscious Owners: SignWell If keeping overhead low is your top priority, SignWell is one of the best-kept secrets in small business software. * Why it’s great for s...”
gemini position 4 · “best e-signature software for small business”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as SignWell.

#BrandScoreShared questions
28 DocuSign 32.1 15
65 Adobe Sign 25.2 15
68 HelloSign 24.8 14
24 PandaDoc 35.5 13
131 SignNow 13.3 7
290 Dropbox Sign 5.8 3
124 Best Free/Budget Option 13.8 1
74 Best Budget-Friendly Option 22.6 1

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

SignWell AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →