AI Visibility Score

Zoho Recruit

6.5 / 100

Ranked #253 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28

Questions named in
4
Total mentions
4
Average position
5.3
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Zoho Recruit.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 7.9 #230 4 5.3

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“…literally $0, you can still get a very capable ATS. * Zoho Recruit: Zoho is famous for its generous free plans. Their free ATS version allows you to post jobs, manage candidates, and use basic parsin...”
gemini position 2 · “cheapest applicant tracking software”
“…down by what they do best: 1. Best Overall Free ATS: Zoho Recruit * Why it’s great: Zoho has one of the most generous free tiers on the market for small businesses and solopreneurs. It supports job...”
gemini position 5 · “best free applicant tracking tool”
“…running in an afternoon. 5. Best Free/Budget Option: Zoho Recruit If budget is a primary concern, Zoho Recruit offers a surprisingly powerful free tier, as well as very affordably priced paid plans....”
gemini position 7 · “top applicant tracking platforms”
“…or large hiring teams. 4. Best Budget / Free Option: Zoho Recruit If you are a bootstrap startup or a solopreneur who needs to track candidates without spending a dime, Zoho Recruit offers a surpris...”
gemini position 7 · “recommend a good applicant tracking tool”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as Zoho Recruit.

#BrandScoreShared questions
87 Workable 19.2 3
105 Breezy HR 15.6 3
71 Lever 23.5 2
41 Workday 30.2 2
80 Greenhouse 21.6 2
194 Ashby 9.3 1
93 Best Truly Free Options 18.3 1
31 BambooHR 31.7 1

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

Zoho Recruit AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →