AI Visibility Score
Castos
8.1
/ 100
Ranked #221 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28
- Questions named in
- 5
- Total mentions
- 5
- Average position
- 4.6
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Castos.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 9.9 | #199 | 5 | 4.6 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“…rt around $12/month. 3. Best for Marketing & Brands: Castos * The Lowdown: If you already have a WordPress website, or if you want deep control over your podcast's web presence, Castos is fantastic....”
gemini
position 3 · “best podcast hosting software”
“…grow. 3. Best for Data Nerds & Multi-Show Creators: Castos Castos is built by podcasters, for podcasters, and it integrates seamlessly with WordPress if you already have a website. * Cost: Starts ar...”
gemini
position 4 · “podcast hosting software comparison”
“…onth). 3. Best for Professionals, Networks & Brands: Castos * Best for: Power users, businesses, and anyone who uses WordPress. * Why I recommend it: If you already have a WordPress website, Castos...”
gemini
position 4 · “recommend a good podcast hosting tool”
“…host in one place. 4. Best All-in-One Marketing Hub: Castos * Best for: Businesses, educators, and creators who want their podcast deeply integrated with a WordPress website. * Why it shines: Castos...”
gemini
position 5 · “what is the best podcast hosting tool in 2026”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Castos.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 76 | Spotify for Podcasters | 22.4 | 5 |
| 89 | Buzzsprout | 19.0 | 4 |
| 158 | Transistor | 11.0 | 4 |
| 56 | Loom | 26.8 | 3 |
| 189 | Captivate | 9.6 | 2 |
| 192 | Podbean | 9.5 | 1 |
| 117 | Quick Comparison Checklist | 14.5 | 1 |
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.