AI Visibility Score
Transistor
11.0
/ 100
Ranked #158 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28
- Questions named in
- 6
- Total mentions
- 11
- Average position
- 4.2
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Transistor.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 12.1 | #160 | 6 | 4.8 |
| Groq Llama 3.3 70B | 12.3 | #89 | 2 | 1.5 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“When comparing Transistor and Loom, it seems like you're looking at two different tools that serve distinct purposes, particularly in the realm of video creation and screen recording. Let's break down...”
groq
position 1 · “Transistor vs Loom”
“When comparing Transistor and Loom, you are actually looking at two completely different tools that serve very different purposes in a modern workflow. * Loom is a video messaging tool designed for as...”
gemini
position 2 · “Transistor vs Loom”
“…buting your podcast, two popular options are Buzzsprout and Transistor. Both platforms offer a range of features, but they cater to different needs and preferences. Let's break down the key differenc...”
groq
position 2 · “Buzzsprout vs Transistor”
“When comparing Transistor and Loom, you are actually looking at two entirely different tools that solve completely different problems. * Loom is the king of asynchronous video messaging. It’s built fo...”
gemini
position 2 · “Transistor vs Loom”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Transistor.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 89 | Buzzsprout | 19.0 | 9 |
| 76 | Spotify for Podcasters | 22.4 | 6 |
| 189 | Captivate | 9.6 | 4 |
| 192 | Podbean | 9.5 | 4 |
| 56 | Loom | 26.8 | 3 |
| 149 | Cal.com | 11.7 | 3 |
| 45 | Calendly | 29.8 | 3 |
| 221 | Castos | 8.1 | 2 |
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.