AI Visibility Score

JotForm

38.3 / 100

Ranked #19 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28

Questions named in
18
Total mentions
28
Average position
3.0
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees JotForm.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 36.8 #29 16 3.6
Groq Llama 3.3 70B 60.3 #9 10 2.0

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“…w popular ones that are highly rated and widely used. 1. JotForm: JotForm is a powerful and user-friendly form builder that offers a wide range of features, including customizable templates, conditio...”
groq position 1 · “recommend a good form builder tool”
“…, modern, high-conversion look and feel as Typeform: * Jotform: If you feel limited by Typeform, Jotform is the ultimate antidote. It has a dedicated "Card Forms" layout that mimics Typeform's one-qu...”
gemini position 1 · “Typeform alternatives”
“…r software options that are highly rated and popular: 1. JotForm: JotForm is a versatile and user-friendly form builder that offers a wide range of templates, customization options, and integrations...”
groq position 1 · “best form builder software”
“When comparing Jotform and SurveyMonkey, the most important thing to know is that they were built with different primary purposes in mind. * Jotform is primarily a powerful form builder that happens t...”
gemini position 1 · “Jotform vs SurveyMonkey”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as JotForm.

#BrandScoreShared questions
6 Typeform 56.0 28
11 Google Forms 46.2 27
43 SurveyMonkey 30.0 12
95 Microsoft Forms 17.5 10
138 Formstack 12.8 9
121 WPForms 14.1 9
92 Tally 18.3 7
227 SoSci Survey 7.7 4

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

JotForm AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →