AI Visibility Score

Typeform

56.0 / 100

Ranked #6 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28

Questions named in
27
Total mentions
41
Average position
2.9
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Typeform.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 63.6 #6 25 3.1
Groq Llama 3.3 70B 67.6 #5 14 2.4

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“…at they do best: 1. Best Overall & Best for Surveys: Typeform * The Free Plan Offers: Up to 10 questions per form and 100 responses per month. * Why it’s great: Typeform is famous for its conversati...”
gemini position 1 · “best free form builder tool”
“…rs on the market, broken down by what they do best: 1. Typeform (Best for conversational, engaging design) * What it is: Typeform revolutionized online forms by showing just one question at a time,...”
gemini position 1 · “form builder software comparison”
“…market right now, broken down by what they do best: 1. Typeform (Best for conversational, high-converting forms) If you want forms that actually feel engaging and human, Typeform is the gold standar...”
gemini position 1 · “top form builder platforms”
“…form alternatives broken down by what they do best: 1. Typeform (Best for conversational, high-converting surveys) If you like Jotform because it lets you build engaging forms, but you want somethin...”
gemini position 1 · “Jotform alternatives”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as Typeform.

#BrandScoreShared questions
11 Google Forms 46.2 35
19 JotForm 38.3 25
43 SurveyMonkey 30.0 19
72 Qualtrics 23.3 13
95 Microsoft Forms 17.5 12
5 Hotjar 57.7 9
138 Formstack 12.8 9
121 WPForms 14.1 9

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

Typeform AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →