AI Visibility Score
Fathom Analytics
13.2
/ 100
Ranked #134 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28
- Questions named in
- 7
- Total mentions
- 7
- Average position
- 4.7
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Fathom Analytics.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 16.1 | #121 | 7 | 4.7 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“…e Direct 1:1 Competitor (Privacy-First & Lightweight) * Fathom Analytics: This is Plausible's closest rival. Like Plausible, it’s focused on privacy, GDPR compliance, doesn't use cookies (so no annoy...”
gemini
position 1 · “Plausible alternatives”
“…meaning you usually don't need a GDPR cookie banner. * Fathom Analytics: Similar to Plausible, Fathom is a privacy-first, simple analytics tool. It’s famous for its clean, uncluttered interface and s...”
gemini
position 2 · “Google Analytics alternatives”
“…less, Privacy-First Analytics: Plausible Analytics or Fathom Analytics If you love Matomo because it respects user privacy and complies with GDPR, but you hate the cluttered interface and heavy scrip...”
gemini
position 3 · “Matomo alternatives”
“…eep e-commerce tracking and advanced funnel analysis. * Fathom Analytics * Best for: Similar to Plausible—focuses heavily on privacy, speed, and simplicity. It’s known for great customer support and...”
gemini
position 3 · “web analytics software comparison”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Fathom Analytics.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | Plausible Analytics | 25.6 | 7 |
| 5 | Hotjar | 57.7 | 5 |
| 114 | Plausible | 14.8 | 5 |
| 185 | Fathom | 9.8 | 4 |
| 146 | Mixpanel | 11.8 | 4 |
| 78 | PostHog | 21.7 | 4 |
| 53 | Google Analytics 4 | 27.3 | 4 |
| 12 | Microsoft Clarity | 45.5 | 4 |
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.