AI Visibility Score
Plausible Analytics
25.6
/ 100
Ranked #62 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28
- Questions named in
- 11
- Total mentions
- 13
- Average position
- 2.5
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Plausible Analytics.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 31.2 | #56 | 11 | 2.5 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“…r privacy, these are fantastic, lightweight options: * Plausible Analytics: This is one of the most popular lightweight alternatives. It’s open-source, incredibly fast, and fits entirely on a single...”
gemini
position 1 · “Google Analytics alternatives”
“…g with recommendations on which one to choose. --- 1. Plausible Analytics: The Minimalist’s Dream Plausible is an open-source, ultra-lightweight analytics tool designed for people who hate digging t...”
gemini
position 1 · “Matomo vs Plausible”
“…ach does best, and which one you should choose. --- Plausible Analytics: The Privacy-First, Lightweight Tracker Plausible is designed to be a modern, privacy-friendly alternative to Google Analytics...”
gemini
position 1 · “Plausible vs Hotjar”
“…w they compare and which one you should choose. --- Plausible Analytics: The Minimalist & Fast Option Plausible was built for people who hate traditional web analytics because they are too clunky an...”
gemini
position 1 · “Matomo vs Plausible”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Plausible Analytics.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 114 | Plausible | 14.8 | 11 |
| 5 | Hotjar | 57.7 | 7 |
| 53 | Google Analytics 4 | 27.3 | 7 |
| 141 | Matomo | 12.4 | 7 |
| 134 | Fathom Analytics | 13.2 | 6 |
| 185 | Fathom | 9.8 | 6 |
| 12 | Microsoft Clarity | 45.5 | 6 |
| 146 | Mixpanel | 11.8 | 5 |
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.