AI Visibility Score
Plausible
plausible.io
14.8
/ 100
Ranked #114 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28
- Questions named in
- 9
- Total mentions
- 12
- Average position
- 6.2
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Plausible.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 16.0 | #123 | 9 | 7.1 |
| Groq Llama 3.3 70B | 12.3 | #84 | 2 | 1.5 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“…it comes to product analytics and user feedback tools, both Plausible and Hotjar are popular options. However, they cater to different needs and offer distinct features. Plausible is an open-source,...”
groq
position 1 · “Plausible vs Hotjar”
“…two popular alternatives to Google Analytics are Matomo and Plausible. Both offer robust features, but they cater to different needs and preferences. Let's break down the key differences to help you...”
groq
position 2 · “Matomo vs Plausible”
“…you are looking at Google Analytics alternatives: * Plausible or Fathom: Great if you want privacy-focused, simple web analytics without the steep learning curve of Google Analytics. * Mixpanel or A…”
gemini
position 4 · “SurveyMonkey vs Google Analytics”
“…R) in Europe. 2. The Best Privacy-First Alternative: Plausible Analytics (Self-Hosted) or Umami * Best for: A clean, simple dashboard without cookie banners. * Why it’s great: If you hate the bloat...”
gemini
position 4 · “best free web analytics tool”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Plausible.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | Plausible Analytics | 25.6 | 10 |
| 141 | Matomo | 12.4 | 7 |
| 5 | Hotjar | 57.7 | 6 |
| 185 | Fathom | 9.8 | 5 |
| 53 | Google Analytics 4 | 27.3 | 4 |
| 146 | Mixpanel | 11.8 | 4 |
| 12 | Microsoft Clarity | 45.5 | 4 |
| 134 | Fathom Analytics | 13.2 | 4 |
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.