AI Visibility Score
Matomo
12.4
/ 100
Ranked #141 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28
- Questions named in
- 7
- Total mentions
- 11
- Average position
- 4.8
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Matomo.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 13.5 | #144 | 7 | 5.6 |
| Groq Llama 3.3 70B | 12.3 | #83 | 2 | 1.5 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“…analytics, two popular alternatives to Google Analytics are Matomo and Plausible. Both offer robust features, but they cater to different needs and preferences. Let's break down the key differences t...”
groq
position 1 · “Matomo vs Plausible”
“Google Analytics and Matomo (formerly known as Piwik) are two popular web analytics tools that help you track and analyze website traffic, behavior, and conversion rates. Here's a comparison of the tw...”
groq
position 2 · “Google Analytics vs Matomo”
“…ghts into sales, funnels, and marketing attribution: * Matomo: Matomo is often considered the most direct "drop-in" replacement for Google Analytics. It offers both a self-hosted option (free and ope...”
gemini
position 3 · “Google Analytics alternatives”
“Choosing between Google Analytics (GA4) and Matomo really comes down to one fundamental question: Do you care more about deep Google ecosystem integration and free enterprise power, or do you care mor...”
gemini
position 3 · “Google Analytics vs Matomo”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Matomo.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 114 | Plausible | 14.8 | 7 |
| 62 | Plausible Analytics | 25.6 | 6 |
| 53 | Google Analytics 4 | 27.3 | 4 |
| 144 | Google Analytics | 12.1 | 4 |
| 134 | Fathom Analytics | 13.2 | 3 |
| 185 | Fathom | 9.8 | 3 |
| 106 | Steep Learning Curve | 15.6 | 2 |
| 146 | Mixpanel | 11.8 | 2 |
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.