AI Visibility Score
QuickBooks Payroll
10.5
/ 100
Ranked #168 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28
- Questions named in
- 7
- Total mentions
- 7
- Average position
- 5.9
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees QuickBooks Payroll.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 12.8 | #153 | 7 | 5.9 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“…ing cheaper. 4. Best for Working with an Accountant: QuickBooks Payroll If you already use QuickBooks Online for your bookkeeping, keeping your payroll under the same roof is a major convenience. *...”
gemini
position 4 · “Gusto alternatives”
“…tional teams. 3. Best for Existing QuickBooks Users: QuickBooks Payroll If you already use QuickBooks Online for your accounting, keeping your payroll within the same ecosystem is a very logical ste...”
gemini
position 4 · “payroll software comparison”
“…ling quickly. 3. Best for Existing QuickBooks Users: QuickBooks Payroll If you already use QuickBooks Online for your accounting, keeping your payroll under the same roof is a huge time-saver. * Why...”
gemini
position 5 · “recommend a good payroll tool”
“…oing it yourself through your bank or a cheaper tool like QuickBooks Payroll or OnPay. * Not Built for Enterprise: If you have hundreds of employees, complex multi-state union rules, or advanced shif...”
gemini
position 6 · “is Gusto worth it”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as QuickBooks Payroll.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | Rippling | 39.4 | 6 |
| 9 | Gusto | 51.8 | 5 |
| 154 | Payroll4Free | 11.4 | 4 |
| 111 | OnPay | 15.2 | 4 |
| 175 | ADP | 10.3 | 3 |
| 88 | Deel | 19.2 | 3 |
| 74 | Best Budget-Friendly Option | 22.6 | 2 |
| 169 | Remote.com | 10.5 | 2 |
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.