AI Visibility Score
Alternatives to Consider
12.7
/ 100
Ranked #140 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28
- Questions named in
- 7
- Total mentions
- 7
- Average position
- 4.3
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Alternatives to Consider.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 15.5 | #129 | 7 | 4.3 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“…ble templates, analytics, and payment collection. --- Alternatives to Consider Depending on your specific needs, you might want to look at a few competitors: 1. DocuSign: The gold standard for enter...”
gemini
position 1 · “is PandaDoc worth it”
“…asic surveys; paid plans for advanced features) | --- Alternatives to Consider Depending on your exact needs, you might also look at these competitors: * If you are looking at Google Analytics alter...”
gemini
position 3 · “SurveyMonkey vs Google Analytics”
“…your tier-1 support through natural language AI. --- Alternatives to Consider If neither of these feels quite right: * Zendesk: The ultimate enterprise competitor to Freshdesk—more powerful, but als...”
gemini
position 3 · “Freshdesk vs Intercom”
“…eding multivariate testing and dedicated support. --- Alternatives to Consider If Mailchimp doesn't sound quite right, check out these alternatives: 1. Best for Budget & Simplicity: MailerLite * *Wh...”
gemini
position 5 · “is Mailchimp worth it”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Alternatives to Consider.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | Freshdesk | 35.6 | 3 |
| 4 | Zendesk | 60.4 | 2 |
| 2 | Notion | 64.1 | 2 |
| 17 | Asana | 39.5 | 2 |
| 14 | Intercom | 45.0 | 2 |
| 7 | monday.com | 55.2 | 2 |
| 20 | HelpScout | 37.8 | 2 |
| 144 | Google Analytics | 12.1 | 2 |
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.