AI Visibility Score

Document360

9.8 / 100

Ranked #186 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28

Questions named in
6
Total mentions
6
Average position
5.0
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Document360.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 12.0 #166 6 5.0

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“…to customers, these are your best low-cost options: * Document360 (Starts around $149/project/month, but has a Free Tier): While their paid plans are geared toward growing businesses, Document360 off...”
gemini position 2 · “cheapest knowledge base software”
“…re searching for—even if they didn't find an article. * Document360: * *Best for:* SaaS companies and technical products that need a clean, structured documentation hub. * *Why choose it:* It feature...”
gemini position 3 · “knowledge base software comparison”
“…ory. 3. Best Dedicated, Feature-Rich Knowledge Base: Document360 If you want a platform built *solely* for publishing documentation—complete with powerful search, Markdown support, category manageme...”
gemini position 5 · “best knowledge base software”
“…document repository. 4. Best Simple & Modern Option: Document360 Document360 strikes a great balance between a powerful public knowledge base and an internal team wiki. * Why it’s great: It features...”
gemini position 6 · “best knowledge base software for small business”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as Document360.

#BrandScoreShared questions
2 Notion 64.1 6
4 Zendesk 60.4 4
14 Intercom 45.0 4
182 Confluence 9.9 4
20 HelpScout 37.8 4
296 Guru 5.6 3
44 HubSpot Service Hub 29.9 2
22 Freshdesk 35.6 1

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

Document360 AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →