AI Visibility Score

Buffer

41.5 / 100

Ranked #19 of 440 scored brands · as of 2026-11-12

Questions named in
11
Total mentions
13
Average position
1.5
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Buffer.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 58.4 #11 11 1.5

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“Choosing between Buffer and Hootsuite usually comes down to two things: simplicity vs. power (and your budget). Both are giants in the social media management space, but they approach the job quite di...”
gemini position 1 · “Buffer vs Hootsuite”
“When deciding between Buffer and Hootsuite, it really comes down to what you value more: simplicity and affordability (Buffer) or robust enterprise features and deep analytics (Hootsuite). Both are gi...”
gemini position 1 · “Buffer vs Hootsuite”
“…et right now, broken down by who they are best for: 1. Buffer: Best for Simplicity and Solopreneurs If you want something clean, straightforward, and affordable without a steep learning curve, Buffe...”
gemini position 1 · “best social media scheduling software”
“…ere are the top contenders on the market right now: 1. Buffer (Best Overall for Individuals & Beginners) Buffer is widely considered the gold standard for free social media management. Its interface...”
gemini position 1 · “best free social media scheduling tool”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as Buffer.

#BrandScoreShared questions
64 Later 26.8 11
71 Hootsuite 24.5 9
92 Metricool 18.9 8
151 Sprout Social 11.7 5
21 Pro Tip 39.7 3
31 Zoom 35.5 3
82 Screaming Frog 21.4 2
27 Google Meet 36.5 2

Compare Buffer with

All comparisons →

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

Buffer AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →