AI Visibility Score

Copper

10.4 / 100

Ranked #164 of 440 scored brands · as of 2026-11-12

Questions named in
5
Total mentions
6
Average position
5.8
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Copper.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Groq GPT-OSS 120B 14.0 #80 4 6.5

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“…eline. 4. Best for G Suite / Google Workspace Users: Copper If your team lives inside Gmail, Google Calendar, and Google Drive, Copper is designed to feel like a natural extension of those tools. *...”
gemini position 4 · “CRM software comparison”
“…nt, contact management, and sales pipeline management. 5. Copper: Copper is a CRM that's specifically designed for Google Workspace (formerly G Suite) users. It offers a free plan, as well as a paid...”
groq position 5 · “cheapest CRM software”
“…icing. 5. Best for G Suite / Google Workspace Users: Copper * Why it’s great: If your business lives inside Gmail, Google Calendar, and Google Drive, Copper is designed specifically for you. * The s...”
gemini position 5 · “CRM software comparison”
“…s. It's also worth noting that some newer CRM tools like Copper and monday.com are also gaining popularity, they offer a more modern and flexible approach to CRM, with a focus on automation and cust...”
groq position 6 · “what is the best CRM tool in 2026”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as Copper.

#BrandScoreShared questions
1 HubSpot 100.0 15
36 Pipedrive 34.5 12
87 Salesforce 20.8 12
58 Freshsales 27.9 11
40 Zoho CRM 33.4 9
10 monday.com 47.7 7
191 Microsoft Dynamics 365 8.8 3
35 ActiveCampaign 34.7 1

Compare Copper with

All comparisons →

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

Copper AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →