AI Visibility Score

Mailchimp

mailchimp.com

71.1 / 100

Ranked #7 of 180 scored brands · as of 2026-09-18

Questions named in
11
Total mentions
11
Average position
3.2
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Mailchimp.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 71.1 #7 11 3.2

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“…usinesses looking to level up their email marketing. Both Mailchimp and Klaviyo are powerful tools, but they cater to very different needs. Let's break down the key differences to help you decide whi...”
gemini position 1 · “Mailchimp vs Klaviyo”
“…d highly-regarded email marketing software solutions: 1. Mailchimp: A popular and user-friendly option, Mailchimp offers a free plan for up to 2,000 subscribers and 12,000 emails per month. It's a gr...”
groq position 1 · “best email marketing software”
“…hoose from. Here are a few of my top recommendations: 1. Mailchimp: Mailchimp is one of the most popular email marketing tools out there, and for good reason. It offers a free plan that allows you to...”
groq position 1 · “best free email marketing tool”
“…and user reviews, here are some top recommendations: 1. Mailchimp: A popular choice among small businesses, Mailchimp offers a free plan for up to 2,000 subscribers and 12,000 emails per month. Its u...”
groq position 1 · “best email marketing software for small business”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as Mailchimp.

#BrandScoreShared questions
24 MailerLite 38.5 39
15 Klaviyo 56.5 37
32 ActiveCampaign 31.2 36
21 ConvertKit 41.9 34
13 Brevo 62.7 29
2 HubSpot 95.7 22
43 Kit 23.5 16
16 Pipedrive 51.6 8

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

Mailchimp AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →