AI Visibility Score
Metabase
8.0
/ 100
Ranked #214 of 440 scored brands · as of 2026-11-12
- Questions named in
- 4
- Total mentions
- 4
- Average position
- 8.8
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Metabase.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 11.3 | #172 | 4 | 8.8 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“…ither have generous free tiers or low fixed pricing. * Metabase * The Deal: Free open-source version (self-hosted on your own server), with cloud-hosted paid plans starting around $85/month total (no...”
gemini
position 3 · “cheapest business intelligence software”
“…it on a server. 4. Best Alternative Open-Source Tool: Metabase * Best for: Teams that want open-source simplicity and a gorgeous user interface. * Why it’s great: Like Superset, Metabase is open-sou...”
gemini
position 5 · “best free business intelligence tool”
“…I): Connect Google Looker Studio (which is free) or Metabase to your warehouse to build easy-to-read dashboards for your team. My Recommendation: If you aren't tied to AWS, start with a free trial of...”
gemini
position 12 · “best data warehouse software for small business”
“…is space include Tableau, Microsoft Power BI, and Metabase). If you are starting a modern data stack from scratch, the standard industry playbook is actually to pipe your raw data into Snowflake, and...”
gemini
position 15 · “Looker vs Snowflake”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Metabase.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 76 | Snowflake | 22.6 | 4 |
| 119 | Looker | 15.1 | 3 |
| 189 | Looker Studio | 8.8 | 2 |
| 37 | Microsoft Power BI | 34.3 | 2 |
| 170 | Google Looker Studio | 10.0 | 2 |
| 108 | Google BigQuery | 16.8 | 2 |
| 182 | Domo | 9.1 | 1 |
| 98 | Power BI | 18.3 | 1 |
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.