AI Visibility Score
Microsoft OneNote
13.6
/ 100
Ranked #135 of 440 scored brands · as of 2026-11-12
- Questions named in
- 6
- Total mentions
- 6
- Average position
- 5.3
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Microsoft OneNote.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 19.1 | #116 | 6 | 5.3 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“…iCloud, Google Drive, or a free tool like Syncthing. * Microsoft OneNote (Best for heavy typers and students) * Cost: 100% free. You just need a Microsoft account. * Why it’s great: Unlike Ever…”
gemini
position 2 · “cheapest note taking software”
“…nization, PDF markup, and math calculations. *(Free)* * Microsoft OneNote: The digital equivalent of a physical three-ring binder. You can type, write with a stylus, and drop images anywhere on an in...”
gemini
position 4 · “best note taking software”
“…long-form writing or organizing complex research. 4. Microsoft OneNote (Best traditional digital binder) * What it is: A free note-taking app that mimics a physical three-ring binder with sections a...”
gemini
position 4 · “best free note taking tool”
“…a seamless daily log combined with networked notes. 5. Microsoft OneNote (Best Free Digital Notebook) * How it works: OneNote mimics a physical binder with virtual tabs, sections, and pages. * Why p...”
gemini
position 5 · “top note taking platforms”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Microsoft OneNote.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | Obsidian | 35.0 | 7 |
| 15 | Notion | 45.0 | 6 |
| 120 | Evernote | 15.1 | 6 |
| 91 | Apple Notes | 19.0 | 4 |
| 132 | Google Keep | 13.7 | 4 |
| 148 | Logseq | 11.9 | 3 |
| 27 | Google Meet | 36.5 | 2 |
| 31 | Zoom | 35.5 | 1 |
Compare Microsoft OneNote with
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.