AI Visibility Score

Typeform

54.0 / 100

Ranked #19 of 211 scored brands · as of 2026-07-29

Questions named in
10
Total mentions
10
Average position
2.4
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Typeform.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 23.2 #63 2 1.5
Groq Llama 3.3 70B 41.2 #28 8 2.6

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“Choosing between Typeform and Jotform really comes down to what you value more: design and user experience (Typeform) or power and flexibility (Jotform). Both are industry giants in the online form an...”
gemini position 1 · “Typeform vs Jotform”
“…best: 1. Best Overall for Design & User Experience: Typeform If you care about how your forms look and want high completion rates, Typeform is the gold standard. Instead of a long, boring page of qu...”
gemini position 1 · “recommend a good form builder tool”
“…market right now, categorized by what they do best: 1. Typeform * Best for: Beautiful, engaging, conversational forms. * Why it’s great: Typeform revolutionized online forms by showing only one ques...”
gemini position 1 · “top form builder platforms”
“Choosing between Typeform and Jotform really comes down to what you value more: aesthetic design and user experience or deep functionality and advanced data collection. Both are top-tier form builders...”
gemini position 1 · “Typeform vs Jotform”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as Typeform.

#BrandScoreShared questions
3 JotForm 74.5 24
14 Google Forms 62.5 22
47 Formstack 33.7 8
55 Microsoft Forms 25.6 7
72 123ContactForm 18.8 5
96 Wufoo 15.4 4
30 WordPress 45.2 2
1 HubSpot 100.0 1

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

Typeform AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →