AI Visibility Score
Claude
16.7
/ 100
Ranked #109 of 440 scored brands · as of 2026-11-12
- Questions named in
- 7
- Total mentions
- 7
- Average position
- 4.4
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Claude.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 23.6 | #94 | 7 | 4.4 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“…learning new topics, and everyday problem-solving. 2. Claude (by Anthropic) — *Best for Writing & Coding* * Why it’s great: Many writers, developers, and researchers prefer Claude over ChatGPT becau...”
gemini
position 2 · “best free AI chatbot tool”
“…tailor it to specific tasks without needing to code. * Claude (Anthropic): Claude (specifically Claude 3.5 Sonnet) is a massive favorite among developers, writers, and analysts. It’s known for having...”
gemini
position 2 · “top AI chatbot platforms”
“…. 3. The Best for Long Documents & Creative Writing: Claude (Anthropic) * Best for: Analyzing massive documents, nuanced writing, and coding. * Why I recommend it: Created by former OpenAI researche...”
gemini
position 3 · “recommend a good AI chatbot tool”
“…for Power Users & Complex Tasks: OpenAI ChatGPT (GPT-5 / Claude-tier reasoning) * Best for: Coding, deep analysis, creative writing, and custom mini-apps (GPTs). * Why it shines: OpenAI remains a pow...”
gemini
position 5 · “what is the best AI chatbot tool in 2026”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Claude.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90 | ChatGPT | 19.2 | 6 |
| 104 | Microsoft Copilot | 17.3 | 5 |
| 153 | Google Gemini | 11.4 | 5 |
| 20 | Intercom | 41.2 | 3 |
| 13 | Tidio | 46.9 | 3 |
| 66 | HubSpot Service Hub | 26.2 | 1 |
| 150 | Fin | 11.8 | 1 |
| 1 | HubSpot | 100.0 | 1 |
Compare Claude with
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.