AI Visibility Score

Google Meet

50.2 / 100

Ranked #24 of 239 scored brands · as of 2026-09-12

Questions named in
10
Total mentions
10
Average position
2.7
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Google Meet.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 50.2 #24 10 2.7

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“…ations right now, broken down by what they do best: 1. Google Meet — Best for Casual Users & Google Users If you and the people you meet with already have Google accounts (Gmail, Workspace), this is...”
gemini position 1 · “best free video conferencing tool”
“It’s a bit like comparing apples and spaceships! Google Meet and Evernote are designed for completely different tasks, so you aren't really choosing one *over* the other. Instead, you'll likely use bo...”
gemini position 1 · “Google Meet vs Evernote”
“…the top contenders that offer robust free tiers: 1. Google Meet (Best for most users & everyday use) If you have a Google account (Gmail), you already have access to Google Meet. It’s entirely brows...”
gemini position 1 · “best free video conferencing tool”
“…g budget, you might not need to pay anything at all. * Google Meet: * Price: Free for meetings up to 60 minutes (for 3+ people; 1-on-1 calls can last up to 24 hours). Paid Google Workspace plans star...”
gemini position 1 · “cheapest video conferencing software”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as Google Meet.

#BrandScoreShared questions
17 Zoom 58.4 35
54 Microsoft Teams 33.7 26
81 Cisco Webex 19.9 8
32 Later 45.3 5
64 Evernote 28.4 4
9 Notion 66.9 2
66 Microsoft OneNote 27.0 2
56 Apple Notes 31.9 1

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

Google Meet AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →