AI Visibility Score
Discord
15.3
/ 100
Ranked #116 of 440 scored brands · as of 2026-11-12
- Questions named in
- 7
- Total mentions
- 7
- Average position
- 5.0
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Discord.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 21.6 | #104 | 7 | 5.0 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“…meetings on the free tier have a 30-hour time limit.* * Discord: * The Deal: 100% free with no time limits. * Why it’s great: While traditionally for gamers, communities and small teams use…”
gemini
position 3 · “cheapest video conferencing software”
“…365 subscriptions starting around $4/user/month. 4. Discord (Best for Communities & Casual Hangouts) * Best for: Gaming groups, friends, online communities, and casual chatting. * Why I recommend it...”
gemini
position 4 · “recommend a good video conferencing tool”
“…a steeper learning curve than Zoom or Google Meet. 5. Discord (Best for Casual Communities & Gamers) While traditionally built for gamers, Discord has become a powerhouse for communities, study grou...”
gemini
position 5 · “video conferencing software comparison”
“…id free tier; paid plans start around $14.50/month. 5. Discord (Best for Casual Communities & Gamers) While not a traditional corporate tool, Discord has evolved into a powerhouse for casual video c...”
gemini
position 5 · “top video conferencing platforms”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Discord.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39 | Microsoft Teams | 34.0 | 7 |
| 31 | Zoom | 35.5 | 6 |
| 27 | Google Meet | 36.5 | 6 |
| 101 | Slack | 17.7 | 5 |
| 177 | Cisco Webex | 9.3 | 4 |
| 68 | Jira | 25.5 | 4 |
| 160 | Linear | 10.6 | 1 |
| 18 | Asana | 42.8 | 1 |
Compare Discord with
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.