AI Visibility Score

Google Sites

6.3 / 100

Ranked #263 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28

Questions named in
4
Total mentions
4
Average position
5.0
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Google Sites.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Groq Llama 3.3 70B 11.3 #98 3 4.7

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“…card processing fees when you actually make a sale. * Google Sites: As basic as it gets, but it’s 100% free, has no ads, and is super easy to use if you just need a simple landing page or portfolio....”
gemini position 3 · “cheapest website builder software”
“…g it a great option for bloggers and small businesses. 4. Google Sites: Google Sites is a free website builder that's part of the Google Drive suite of tools. It's simple to use and offers a range of...”
groq position 4 · “best free website builder tool”
“…ustom domain, 50GB of bandwidth, and 500MB of storage. 4. Google Sites: Google Sites is a free website builder that's part of the Google Drive suite. It's a simple, easy-to-use option with limited cu...”
groq position 4 · “cheapest website builder software”
“…and a complex structure, you'll outgrow it quickly. 5. Google Sites (100% Free, No Ads) * Best for: Internal wikis, basic event pages, student portfolios, or ultra-simple informational sites. * The...”
gemini position 5 · “best free website builder tool”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as Google Sites.

#BrandScoreShared questions
26 Wix 33.3 12
33 WordPress 31.4 11
27 Shopify 32.3 8
55 Squarespace 27.2 7
133 Carrd 13.3 5
110 Weebly 15.3 4
184 Hostinger Website Builder 9.8 3
274 Strikingly 6.1 3

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

Google Sites AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →