AI Visibility Score

WordPress

wordpress.org

45.2 / 100

Ranked #30 of 211 scored brands · as of 2026-07-29

Questions named in
10
Total mentions
11
Average position
4.7
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees WordPress.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 27.2 #32 3 5.3
Groq Llama 3.3 70B 34.5 #40 8 4.5

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“When comparing WordPress and Typeform, it helps to realize right away that they aren’t actually direct competitors. They do very different things, and in many cases, people actually use them *together...”
gemini position 1 · “WordPress vs Typeform”
“When comparing WordPress and Typeform, it helps to realize right away that you are comparing apples to oranges. They serve fundamentally different purposes, though they do overlap in one key area: col...”
gemini position 1 · “WordPress vs Typeform”
“…thout touching a line of code, Wix is hard to beat. 2. WordPress.com (wordpress.com) — *Best for Blogs and Content-Heavy Sites* * The Free Plan: Gives you a free WordPress-powered site with basic de...”
gemini position 2 · “best free website builder tool”
“Choosing between Wix and WordPress is one of the classic debates in web design. The short answer is: Wix is great if you want simplicity and speed, while WordPress is best if you want ultimate control...”
gemini position 2 · “Wix vs WordPress”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as WordPress.

#BrandScoreShared questions
2 Wix 75.4 19
28 Squarespace 46.8 13
57 Shopify 24.3 12
38 Weebly 39.0 9
101 Strikingly 15.0 4
113 E-commerce 13.6 2
19 Typeform 54.0 2
32 ConvertKit 44.6 2

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

WordPress AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →