AI Visibility Score

Greenhouse

25.6 / 100

Ranked #39 of 180 scored brands · as of 2026-09-18

Questions named in
4
Total mentions
4
Average position
3.3
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Greenhouse.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 25.6 #39 4 3.3

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“…best for: 1. Best Overall for Startups & Mid-Market: Greenhouse If you want a platform that scales with you and focuses heavily on structured, bias-free hiring, Greenhouse remains the gold standard....”
gemini position 1 · “what is the best applicant tracking tool in 2026”
“…for: 1. Best Overall for Small-to-Medium Businesses: Greenhouse or Lever * Greenhouse: Widely considered the gold standard for structured hiring. It has fantastic collaboration tools for hiring mana...”
gemini position 1 · “recommend a good applicant tracking tool”
“…1. Best for Small-to-Medium Businesses (SMBs) & Startups: Greenhouse or Lever * Greenhouse: This is widely considered the gold standard for tech and high-growth companies. It’s fantastic for structur...”
gemini position 1 · “top applicant tracking platforms”
“…1. Best for Small-to-Medium Businesses (SMBs) & Startups: Greenhouse or Lever If you are scaling quickly and want a system that balances power with ease of use, both Greenhouse and Lever remain indus...”
gemini position 1 · “what is the best applicant tracking tool in 2026”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as Greenhouse.

#BrandScoreShared questions
36 Lever 28.2 38
14 BambooHR 58.4 26
37 Workday 26.9 25
10 Rippling 67.2 17
9 Gusto 69.5 13
35 Deel 29.4 7
28 Intercom 35.7 5
2 HubSpot 95.7 2

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

Greenhouse AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →