AI Visibility Score
Microsoft Clarity
83.2
/ 100
Ranked #2 of 366 scored brands · as of 2026-09-13
- Questions named in
- 18
- Total mentions
- 20
- Average position
- 2.2
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Microsoft Clarity.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 83.2 | #2 | 18 | 2.2 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“…et right now, broken down by who they are best for: 1. Microsoft Clarity (Best for visual testing & heatmaps) While traditionally known as a free heatmapping and session-recording tool, Microsoft Cl...”
gemini
position 1 · “best free A/B testing tool”
“…vaScript, though it requires some technical know-how. * Microsoft Clarity: Primarily a session-recording and heatmapping tool, Clarity is 100% free and integrates smoothly with Google Analytics, allo...”
gemini
position 1 · “cheapest A/B testing software”
“…t requires technical setup and lacks a visual editor. * Microsoft Clarity: While primarily known for session recording and heatmaps, Microsoft Clarity is 100% free and integrates well with experiment...”
gemini
position 1 · “cheapest A/B testing software”
“…Alternatives (Heatmaps + Session Replays + Feedback) * Microsoft Clarity * Why it’s great: It is completely free with no traffic limits, making it the most popular alternative for anyone trying to cu...”
gemini
position 1 · “Hotjar alternatives”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Microsoft Clarity.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Hotjar | 81.2 | 50 |
| 36 | Google Analytics 4 | 43.3 | 24 |
| 77 | Crazy Egg | 25.8 | 22 |
| 10 | VWO | 59.3 | 21 |
| 105 | Plausible | 19.2 | 20 |
| 65 | Plausible Analytics | 31.4 | 19 |
| 160 | Mixpanel | 12.0 | 13 |
| 118 | FullStory | 16.4 | 12 |
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.