AI Visibility Score
Hotjar
98.1
/ 100
Ranked #2 of 239 scored brands · as of 2026-09-12
- Questions named in
- 18
- Total mentions
- 18
- Average position
- 2.3
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Hotjar.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 98.1 | #2 | 18 | 2.3 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“…roduct analytics, user feedback, or funnel tracking: * Hotjar: This is the tool that popularized session recordings and heatmaps. It’s very similar to Clarity in terms of UI and ease of use, but it o...”
gemini
position 1 · “Microsoft Clarity alternatives”
“…massive brands). 2. Best for User Behavior & Heatmaps: Hotjar or Microsoft Clarity * Best for: Seeing *how* users actually interact with your pages (clicks, scrolls, dead ends). * The Lowdown: Tradi...”
gemini
position 1 · “web analytics software comparison”
“…available today, broken down by what they do best: 1. Hotjar (Best All-Rounder for UX & Feedback) Hotjar is arguably the most popular tool for website heatmaps, and for good reason. It’s user-friend...”
gemini
position 1 · “best heatmap software”
“…ightly different interface or fewer sampling limits: * Hotjar: This is the most direct competitor and the pioneer of session recording and heatmaps. Hotjar is very user-friendly and offers a free tie...”
gemini
position 1 · “Microsoft Clarity alternatives”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Hotjar.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Microsoft Clarity | 84.1 | 40 |
| 1 | Typeform | 100.0 | 36 |
| 10 | Google Forms | 66.1 | 28 |
| 69 | Qualtrics | 25.2 | 27 |
| 44 | SurveyMonkey | 39.3 | 26 |
| 70 | Crazy Egg | 25.2 | 24 |
| 30 | Google Analytics 4 | 47.1 | 20 |
| 49 | Plausible Analytics | 36.3 | 19 |
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.