AI Visibility Score

Nelio A/B Testing

10.7 / 100

Ranked #156 of 429 scored brands · as of 2026-11-10

Questions named in
4
Total mentions
4
Average position
4.5
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Nelio A/B Testing.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 15.1 #134 4 4.5

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“…r budgets. 4. Best for WordPress & Small Businesses: Nelio A/B Testing or Convert If your site is built on WordPress and you don't have a massive enterprise budget, running tests natively can save y...”
gemini position 1 · “best A/B testing software”
“…ice tag. 2. Best for Simplicity and WordPress Sites: Nelio A/B Testing * Why it’s great: If your small business runs on WordPress, Nelio is arguably the most seamless option available. Unlike most t...”
gemini position 3 · “best A/B testing software for small business”
“…l split testing). 2. Best for WordPress & Beginners: Nelio A/B Testing If your website runs on WordPress and you want something plug-and-play, Nelio is a great option. * The Free Aspect: They offer...”
gemini position 7 · “best free A/B testing tool”
“…n bypass expensive SaaS platforms by using a plugin: * Nelio A/B Testing: * Price: Starts around $29/month. * Why it’s great: It is specifically built for WordPress. It lets you test pages, po…”
gemini position 7 · “cheapest A/B testing software”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as Nelio A/B Testing.

#BrandScoreShared questions
16 VWO 44.4 4
114 AB Tasty 15.4 3
118 PostHog 15.2 2
7 Microsoft Clarity 52.7 2
44 WordPress 31.7 2
45 Google Analytics 4 31.7 2
75 Optimizely 22.9 1
83 MailerLite 21.4 1

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

Nelio A/B Testing AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →