AI Visibility Score
Fathom
10.3
/ 100
Ranked #188 of 366 scored brands · as of 2026-09-13
- Questions named in
- 4
- Total mentions
- 4
- Average position
- 8.3
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Fathom.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 10.3 | #188 | 4 | 8.3 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“…rst & Lightweight Alternative: Plausible Analytics or Fathom If you are exhausted by bloated dashboards, cookie banners, and GDPR compliance headaches, lightweight analytics are the gold standard in...”
gemini
position 3 · “what is the best web analytics tool in 2026”
“…tives on the market right now: 1. The Closest Match: Fathom Analytics * Best for: Simplicity and privacy, much like Plausible. * Why it’s great: Fathom is built on the same ethos as Plausible—simple...”
gemini
position 5 · “Plausible alternatives”
“…cy-First & Lightweight Option: Plausible Analytics or Fathom * Best for: Small businesses, bloggers, and privacy advocates who hate cookie banners. * Why use them: If you are overwhelmed by GA4 and j...”
gemini
position 5 · “best web analytics software”
“…ey do best: 1. The Best All-Around SaaS Alternative: Fathom Analytics If you love Matomo’s privacy-first approach (cookieless, GDPR compliant) but are tired of managing software updates, database bl...”
gemini
position 6 · “Matomo alternatives”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Fathom.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Hotjar | 81.2 | 22 |
| 65 | Plausible Analytics | 31.4 | 22 |
| 105 | Plausible | 19.2 | 20 |
| 125 | Fathom Analytics | 15.4 | 17 |
| 36 | Google Analytics 4 | 43.3 | 15 |
| 160 | Mixpanel | 12.0 | 14 |
| 2 | Microsoft Clarity | 83.2 | 13 |
| 93 | PostHog | 22.4 | 9 |
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.