AI Visibility Score
Harvest
29.8
/ 100
Ranked #50 of 440 scored brands · as of 2026-11-12
- Questions named in
- 11
- Total mentions
- 14
- Average position
- 3.4
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Harvest.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 37.3 | #53 | 10 | 3.2 |
| Groq GPT-OSS 120B | 10.7 | #107 | 2 | 4.5 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“Harvest and Clockify are both popular time-tracking tools used by individuals and teams to manage their work hours, projects, and clients. Here's a comparison of the two: Similarities: * Both Harvest...”
groq
position 1 · “Harvest vs Clockify”
“Both Toggl Track and Harvest are fantastic time-tracking and productivity tools, but they were built with slightly different types of users in mind. Here is the quick breakdown: Toggl is best for raw...”
gemini
position 2 · “Toggl vs Harvest”
“When comparing Harvest and Clockify, you are looking at two of the most popular time-tracking tools on the market, but they cater to slightly different needs, budgets, and team workflows. Here is a na...”
gemini
position 2 · “Harvest vs Clockify”
“Both Toggl Track and Harvest are fantastic time-tracking and productivity tools, but they are built for slightly different types of users and workflows. The short version is: Choose Toggl if you want...”
gemini
position 2 · “Toggl vs Harvest”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Harvest.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | Clockify | 37.8 | 12 |
| 34 | Toggl Track | 34.9 | 10 |
| 130 | RescueTime | 14.1 | 6 |
| 2 | QuickBooks | 67.1 | 4 |
| 22 | Xero | 38.9 | 4 |
| 187 | Hubstaff | 8.9 | 4 |
| 10 | monday.com | 47.7 | 3 |
| 6 | FreshBooks | 53.5 | 3 |
Compare Harvest with
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.