AI Visibility Score

Clockify

37.8 / 100

Ranked #24 of 440 scored brands · as of 2026-11-12

Questions named in
11
Total mentions
15
Average position
1.7
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Clockify.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 49.0 #27 10 1.7
Groq GPT-OSS 120B 17.0 #64 3 2.0

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“Clockify and Teachable are two very different tools that serve distinct purposes. To help you decide between them, let's break down what each platform does. Clockify is a time-tracking and employee mo...”
groq position 1 · “Clockify vs Teachable”
“When comparing Harvest and Clockify, you are looking at two of the most popular time-tracking tools on the market, but they cater to slightly different needs, budgets, and team workflows. Here is a na...”
gemini position 1 · “Harvest vs Clockify”
“Comparing Clockify and Teachable is a bit like comparing apples to airplanes—they serve completely different purposes, though they both fall under the broad umbrella of running a business. Here is the...”
gemini position 1 · “Clockify vs Teachable”
“When choosing between Harvest and Clockify, you are really looking at two different philosophies of time tracking: Harvest is built for invoicing and profitability, while Clockify is built for pure ti...”
gemini position 1 · “Harvest vs Clockify”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as Clockify.

#BrandScoreShared questions
50 Harvest 29.8 13
34 Toggl Track 34.9 10
130 RescueTime 14.1 6
187 Hubstaff 8.9 4
10 monday.com 47.7 3
103 Teachable 17.5 3
161 Toggl 10.5 3
38 ClickUp 34.3 2

Compare Clockify with

All comparisons →

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

Clockify AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →