AI Visibility Score
Clockify
29.1
/ 100
Ranked #48 of 558 scored brands · as of 2026-07-28
- Questions named in
- 13
- Total mentions
- 17
- Average position
- 2.8
- Sample
- 7 days
Engine by engine
Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Clockify.
| Engine | Score | Rank | Questions | Avg position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash Lite | 32.4 | #50 | 12 | 2.9 |
| Groq Llama 3.3 70B | 16.6 | #64 | 3 | 2.0 |
What AI actually said
Unedited excerpts from archived answers.
“Comparing Clockify and Teachable is a bit like comparing apples to airplanes—they serve completely different purposes, though they both fall under the broad umbrella of running a business. Here is the...”
gemini
position 1 · “Clockify vs Teachable”
“When comparing Harvest and Clockify, you are really looking at two different philosophies of time tracking: all-in-one business management versus pure, unlimited time tracking. Both are top-tier tools...”
gemini
position 1 · “Harvest vs Clockify”
“When comparing Clockify and Teachable, you are actually looking at two completely different tools designed for entirely different purposes. * Clockify is a time tracking and productivity tool. * Teach...”
gemini
position 1 · “Clockify vs Teachable”
“Choosing between Harvest and Clockify really comes down to what you need out of a time tracker: Harvest is built for end-to-end agency management (time, invoicing, and expenses), while Clockify is fam...”
gemini
position 1 · “Harvest vs Clockify”
Named alongside
Brands that show up in the same questions as Clockify.
| # | Brand | Score | Shared questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 67 | Harvest | 24.9 | 27 |
| 38 | Toggl Track | 30.5 | 20 |
| 177 | RescueTime | 10.2 | 11 |
| 257 | Hubstaff | 6.4 | 10 |
| 7 | monday.com | 55.2 | 5 |
| 151 | Teachable | 11.6 | 5 |
| 212 | Invoicing | 8.3 | 4 |
| 9 | Gusto | 51.8 | 4 |
Show this on your site
Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.
How this score is calculated
Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.