AI Visibility Score

Toggl Track

34.9 / 100

Ranked #34 of 440 scored brands · as of 2026-11-12

Questions named in
9
Total mentions
10
Average position
1.5
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees Toggl Track.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 49.2 #26 9 1.5

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“Both Toggl Track and Harvest are fantastic time-tracking and productivity tools, but they were built with slightly different types of users in mind. Here is the quick breakdown: Toggl is best for raw...”
gemini position 1 · “Toggl vs Harvest”
“Both Toggl Track and Harvest are fantastic time-tracking and productivity tools, but they are built for slightly different types of users and workflows. The short version is: Choose Toggl if you want...”
gemini position 1 · “Toggl vs Harvest”
“…market right now, broken down by what they do best: 1. Toggl Track (Best Overall for Individuals & Small Teams) If you want something that just works without a steep learning curve, Toggl Track is t...”
gemini position 1 · “best free time tracking tool”
“…nesses right now, broken down by what they do best: 1. Toggl Track — Best Overall for Simplicity If you want something that your team will actually use without complaining, Toggl is the gold standar...”
gemini position 1 · “best time tracking software for small business”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as Toggl Track.

#BrandScoreShared questions
50 Harvest 29.8 10
24 Clockify 37.8 9
130 RescueTime 14.1 5
187 Hubstaff 8.9 4
10 monday.com 47.7 3
38 ClickUp 34.3 2
161 Toggl 10.5 2
154 Invoicing 11.4 2

Compare Toggl Track with

All comparisons →

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

Toggl Track AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →