AI Visibility Score

RescueTime

14.1 / 100

Ranked #130 of 440 scored brands · as of 2026-11-12

Questions named in
6
Total mentions
6
Average position
4.0
Sample
7 days

Engine by engine

Different models recommend different brands. Here's how each one sees RescueTime.

EngineScoreRankQuestionsAvg position
Gemini Flash Lite 16.6 #125 5 4.0

What AI actually said

Unedited excerpts from archived answers.

“…o Toggl, but functionally it is extremely powerful. 3. RescueTime (Best for Automatic, Hands-Off Tracking) If you constantly forget to hit "start" and "stop" on a timer, RescueTime takes the manual...”
gemini position 3 · “best free time tracking tool”
“…rojects. 3. Best for Deep Work & Automatic Tracking: RescueTime If you constantly forget to hit "start" and "stop" on a timer, RescueTime takes the human error out of the equation. * Why it’s great:...”
gemini position 3 · “recommend a good time tracking tool”
“…a range of features, including reporting and invoicing. * RescueTime: A time-tracking tool that automatically tracks how you spend your time on your computer or mobile device, providing valuable insi...”
groq position 4 · “Harvest vs Clockify”
“…eatures. 2. Best for Deep Work & Automatic Tracking: RescueTime If you hate remembering to hit "start" and "stop" on a timer, RescueTime is the way to go. * Why I like it: It runs quietly in the bac...”
gemini position 4 · “best time tracking software”

Named alongside

Brands that show up in the same questions as RescueTime.

#BrandScoreShared questions
24 Clockify 37.8 8
50 Harvest 29.8 8
34 Toggl Track 34.9 5
187 Hubstaff 8.9 2
161 Toggl 10.5 2
38 ClickUp 34.3 1
10 monday.com 47.7 1
18 Asana 42.8 1

Compare RescueTime with

All comparisons →

Show this on your site

Free embeddable badge — one line of HTML, updates itself as the score moves.

RescueTime AI Visibility Score badge

Get the badge

How this score is calculated

Reach (how many questions named the brand) multiplied by prominence (how early it was named), scaled so the most visible brand sits at 100.

Full methodology →